Getting Started
Three steps to your first team analysis.
STEP 1
Complete the Assessment
Answer 8 questions that measure your behavioural dimensions. Takes about 5 minutes. Your profile is stored and used in all future analyses.
STEP 2
Create a Team
In the Workspace, create a team and add members by user ID. Then sync each member's GitHub handle to pull in commit patterns and chronotype data.
STEP 3
Run Full Analysis
Click "Run Full Analysis" in the Workspace. A 4-agent LangGraph pipeline runs in real time and Claude synthesises the final report.
Behavioral Assessment
The assessment measures 8 behavioural dimensions on a weighted scale. Each dimension feeds directly into the compatibility engine — higher-weight dimensions have more influence on the final score.
Chronotype Sync
Peak work-hour overlap — when energy peaks align across the team
Stress Response
How you respond under pressure and tight deadlines
Risk Tolerance
Bold vs cautious decision-making tendencies
Decision Style
Data-driven vs intuitive reasoning preference
Work Style
Solo-focus vs collaborative working preference
Team Resilience
Capacity to absorb and recover from setbacks
Leadership Orientation
Tendency to lead, follow, or self-direct
Innovation Drive
Appetite for novel approaches vs proven methods
Your profile is saved automatically after submission. You can retake the assessment at any time — the latest submission is always used. All team members should complete it before running a team analysis.
GitHub Sync
The GitHub Analyst agent fetches the last 30 days of commit activity from a member's public GitHub handle to build their chronotype profile — their natural work-hour pattern.
schedule What gets fetched
- → Commit timestamps (hour of day distribution)
- → PR merge frequency and review patterns
- → Collaboration index (cross-author review activity)
- → Activity rhythm score (consistency of schedule)
bedtime Chronotype categories
- → Lark — peaks before 10 AM, consistent early committer
- → Daytime — active 10 AM – 5 PM, standard schedule
- → Evening — ramps up after 5 PM, collaborative afternoon
- → Owl — peaks after 10 PM, late-night deep work
- → Flexible — uniform distribution, no strong peak
GitHub Sync only works with public repositories. The sync runs via the Dashboard's GitHub Sync card — enter the member's GitHub handle, not their GitSyntropy user ID.
Compatibility Engine
Pairwise compatibility is scored across 8 dimensions each with a maximum weight, totalling 36 points. Scores above 28/36 are considered excellent collaboration potential.
Score Interpretation
Max: 36 pointsExcellent
High alignment across all dimensions. Strong collaboration potential.
Good
Solid compatibility with minor friction areas. Will work well together.
Workable
Mixed alignment. Requires active communication in weak dimensions.
Challenging
Significant misalignment. Consider pairing strategies and coaching.
Dimensions flagged as "weak" (scoring below 40% of their maximum) are highlighted as critical vulnerabilities — these are the areas where the pair is most likely to experience friction.
Team Analysis Pipeline
"Run Full Analysis" triggers a LangGraph multi-agent pipeline that streams results in real time. Four agents run in sequence, each building on the previous.
GitHub Analyst
Fetches the last 30 days of commit and PR activity for every team member. Classifies each member's chronotype and computes collaboration index and rhythm score.
Psychometric Profiler
Loads each member's assessment answers and maps them to the 8 dimensions. Produces a weighted behavioural profile per person.
Compatibility Engine
Runs pairwise scoring across all member pairs. Identifies strong and weak dimensions, surfaces risk flags (e.g. chronotype mismatches), and computes the aggregate team score.
Claude Synthesis
Claude Sonnet 4.6 streams a structured narrative report — strengths, vulnerabilities, hiring recommendations, and a Monte Carlo candidate simulation for optimal team fit.
Insights Report
The Insights page displays Claude's structured narrative. Each section is clickable and expandable. The report covers:
Team Strengths
Dimensions where the team scores highest — what to double down on.
Critical Vulnerabilities
Weak dimension pairs that are most likely to cause friction or delays.
Chronotype Dynamics
Work-hour overlap analysis — who's in sync and who's asynchronous.
Hiring Recommendations
What behavioural profile would complement the current team's gaps.
Monte Carlo Simulation
1000-iteration simulation of candidate profiles to find the statistically optimal hire.
Recommended Actions
Concrete next steps for improving team health and collaboration.
Reports are saved to your browser's local storage. You can access any previous report by clicking "View Full Report" from the Dashboard, or navigating directly to /report?id=...
Ready to get started?
Complete your assessment first — it takes about 5 minutes and unlocks the full pipeline.